Bringin’ Gas and Dialin’ 9: No More Mr. Nice Guy

June 23, 2009

Redesigning the Site: Soon! (Chill my babies…)

I feel that I have let twist in the wind the concept of designing a web presence that actually works.

I have plenty of interests: sports, entertainment, politics, book thoughts, economics, business and entrepreneurial interests, to name the brief selection.

So when things calm down, and I get time, say July 5th, I will be redesigning all 4 sites:

Anything Written
Anything Written Too
No More Mr. Nice Guy
No More Mr. Nice Guy Too

To meet the needs of the people that visit. (Uh, yeah, should have done that a while back.)

It is my ultimate hope to put the best things I’ve written, proposed and dreamed up in the appropriate categories. I will make it visually stunning – ok, that’s a stretch – but you will know what gives on the site. I tried for 3 years to write all things considered in my noodle in 1/2 blogs. It really did not work.

Meanwhile, I am broaching a point where I can actually see my baseball book come to a decisive end. The title works. The chapters are filling in. The research done in the past two years improves upon the 1st draft done in late 2007. AND — Wait for it — It might be a publishable piece of baseball history and SELL!!??!!???

Well, the last part is more my wishes than reality. But we all have dreams – like sands through the hourglass – these are the summer days of our lives!!!

I’m excited and maybe, irrational at the moment. Irrational in thinking this year is THE Year!

So I hope the redesign is received well as I move forward to the year 2010. And 37…

June 16, 2009

A Second Constitutional Convention: Constitutional Reformation in the 21st Century

The Framers of the U.S. Constitution

The Framers of the U.S. Constitution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is my feeling that we cannot do this job alone, or without a serious overhaul of what our country is.

Back before we had a Constitution, we had the Articles of Confederation. From Wiki (I know, I know):

served as the de facto system of government used by the Congress (”the United States in Congress assembled”) until it became de jure by final ratification on March 1, 1781; at which point Congress became the Congress of the Confederation. The Articles set the rules for operations of the “United States” confederation. The confederation was capable of making war, negotiating diplomatic agreements, and resolving issues regarding the western territories. An important element of the Articles was that Article XIII stipulated that “their provisions shall be inviolably observed by every state” and “the Union shall be perpetual“.

But all of us know, and have lived under Our Constitution for nearly 225 years. The change was due to the looseness of the Confederations, lacked Taxing authority, the “1-vote per state flaw”, and the assumption of Debt payments that were being delayed by the individual states. In short, it lack the feel and philosophies of the current Constitution.

Again from Wiki:

On January 21, 1786, the Virginia Legislature, following James Madison’s recommendation, invited all the states to send delegates to Annapolis, Maryland to discuss ways to reduce these interstate conflicts. At what came to be known as the Annapolis Convention, the few state delegates in attendance endorsed a motion that called for all states to meet in Philadelphia in May, 1787 to discuss ways to improve the Articles of Confederation in a “Grand Convention.” Although the states’ representatives to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia were only authorized to amend the Articles, the representatives held secret, closed-door sessions and wrote a new constitution.

Which is now what I duly propose.

Our Constitution is in need of a revamp to deal with the realities and technology and pitfalls we currently face.

 A Second Constitutional Convention is needed to address problems both internal and external which can not be done by anyone person or currently elected body.

Various Excerpts from this draft:

#1: It will soon be 225 years since this monumental task was engaged in –
“to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic
Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general
Welfare, and secure the Blessing of Liberty to ourselves and our
Posterity…” (Preamble to the United States Constitution.)
 
At many junctures in our nation’s history, we have corrected course via
internal and external threats to our nation’s Posterity.  Seven-five years
after New Hampshire was the ninth state to ratify the Law of the Land
(June 21, 1788), the Civil War waged.  The bloody battle at Gettysburg
set the stage for Abraham Lincoln to speak to the existence of our
Union: “ The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here,
but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to
be dedicated here to the unfinished work [for] which they fought…”
(Gettysburg Address, November 19, 1863.)

#2:Now, as we move again toward the fourth act of our nation’s illustrious
history, we face threats across many fronts – internal and external – that
must be addressed.
 
In the past quarter century, much of what America has become is being
done without a rudder or leadership or a rule or spirit of a guiding hand.
Our President, Barack Obama, spoke to this dilemma in a recent White
House news conference, saying that America was similar to a gigantic
ship that is not, “easily course corrected,” and that it responds, “slowly
to the policies installed.”
   
The recent financial collapses have left Americans trillions of dollars
poorer. Two of the largest and most venerable companies, GM and
Chrysler, are in the process of bankruptcy. The health care system
continues to escalate in cost, while nearly 20% cannot pay for coverage,
and by 2017 nearly one in five dollars will be spent on the system’s
maintenance. Nearly $1.5 Trillion dollars have been pledged to buttress
an economic system in flux, and often, in frail circumstances.
 
Our National Debt has surpassed $10 Trillion dollars. If our Government
would save $1 Billion per day, every day, it would take 27 years and 145
days to eliminate the balance. However, if interest accrues at the same
rate on that $10 Trillion, the net effort would be a zero change to our
Debt. The Crisis is only acerbated by the prolonged Recession, which
requires more deficit spending to spur growth, yet a rationale is needed
to maintain Fiscal Responsibility in the decades to come, else, We will
see unimaginable debts, and harder economic choices, than has befallen
any generation of Americans before.
 
Current Households are getting by on less; with no way to accurately
predict the designs of their companies, or if they will exist in the future
global economy. Energy, Environment, Economics and Existence are
intertwined; with the ignoring of One, or more, to come with the brutal
Human price (at some point) in the response of (and to) the Others. Such
Human costs come today with daily personal aggravations and the brutal
destruction of the Middle Class and Middle America. Dependence has
become a way of life for many, many millions. 
 
The American competitive advantage of Education, Infrastructure and
Manufacturing has evaporated as developing and developed regimes are
exploiting weaknesses and offering American multinational corporations
access to cheap, unencumbered and pliant labor forces that can not or
will not stand up for better working conditions. The enormous profits are
kept; and America grows more complacent, and less able to catch up
when our dollars stay in the hands of never-friendly, duplicitous regimes,
who, reinvest by buying American assets with little regard for the
American people’s way of life. Thus, we are trapped in a cycle that has
to be reversed.
   
Our Rivals in this global Marketplace were once the bane of our
Existence, not for their economy, education, infrastructure, or political
ideas, but because they held Freedom in prison, and ignored their people
forthwith. They still do; but now supplant their peoples’ emerging
industriousness, and desires for a political voice, with the economic
strip mining of natural resources  – and the fact the resources are
indeed, limited, makes it more beneficial to ignore the struggling
population while amassing wealth for the selected few.
 
We are engage in a war. While we attempt to extricate ourselves from
one country, two close neighbors are in need of our Military. These costs
in lives and coin are greater than we seem able to justify or maintain.
And others regimes are revisiting the Cold War with nuclear ambitions
and threats. The Middle East is still as unstable as it has been for a
Millennia.
 
Our government has been severely taxed to function properly; as the
divide over social ills, economic philosophies, foreign policy and
domestic design have been a source of bitter feuding without significant
altering of the direction of the country.
 
 And no one man is able to reset the course alone.
 
The Problems are vast; multi-trillion in nature, and currently are
addressed with only piece-meal and hen-pecked legislation. Meager
victories are attainable – but never go to the root cause – and so, the
time is ripe for amending what it is to be under Constitutional Rule.
 
The Framers to Our Constitution and the Founding Fathers were not idle
people. No one accused Adams, Franklin, Jay, Jefferson, Madison,
Morris, Sherman or Washington of inaction or paralysis in an arena of
battle. They did not sit by and wait for things to happen. They made
things happen. They were builders; doers; dreamers; leaders; opinion
makers; philosophers; scholars and visionaries.

#3: Our Framers allowed for Amendments to make clearer, and
unambiguous, the language and rights ceded to the Individual, and the
Government. Each is dependent on the other; cooperation and
compromise is the hallmark result of our ebb and flow during bitter
conflicts and the paramount concerns over the other’s intrusions into
Rights the other has. The State remains Supreme; but only by the Graces
of those Ruled.
 
A 2011 – 2012 Constitutional Convention to address our Nation’s
problems would be a vast improvement on innovating the future of
America over the piece-meal, penny-wise, but pound-foolish approach
that much of our U.S. legislation attempts futilely. And its time for the
Common Man and the Elite Minds in various arenas to dutifully attempt
to pull together to create a more perfect Union to last another 225 years.

#4: Constitutional reformation is not a new idea.
 
In the mid-1980’s, James L. Sundquist from The Brookings Institution
wrote on the subject in Constitutional Reform and Effective Government
(1986). Then, no mention was ever made of the environment, climate
change (Global Warming), genetics, technology, the internet or
reproductive rights. Only in passing was the term energy policies or
abortion mentioned. 
 
Thus, the need for an updated discussion to determine what should be
the role of our Modern Government; and what are the Rights and
Responsibilities of each branch; and the operation as it is directed
toward the Individual; and is their a better way to solve our various
problems through better, leaner, and a more focused government.
 
If indeed, a quorum develops to execute a Convention – a supermajority
of 30 states, for example – then we can proceed to selection of leaders
to be sent, and the importance of equality of representation based on
expertise, and commonality, and flexibility of action.

#5: It is a hope that with a large contingent that a wide array of opinions can
be brought to bear on the problems. And that discussion in America’s
newspapers, online sites, blogs, podcasts, talk radio, and multimedia
platforms will engage Americans in a Civics discussion of unparallel
proportions in human history.
     
It is a desire to get the best each state has to offer in agriculture, art,
business, economics, education, engineering, legal, medical, political
science, natural science, and technology sectors, to name only a few.

#6: The biggest caveat to delegation representation is that the currently
sitting Congressional members of the United States cannot be apart of
this discussion. They have plenty to handle in the daily oversight and
operation of the Country. (They could testify or provide information on
drafting amendments.) They can resign their post to join the discussion,
but cannot be apart of these two bodies simultaneously.
 
The point of the delegation is not to just bring elite minds to the table
either. At least 10% of the representatives need to be lay community
leaders who represent urban, suburban and rural areas successfully, and
uniquely. Their intimate connection is as important as the ivory tower
scientist, or tempered-glass, high-rise, Wall Street-minded executive who
will be as much apart of the discussion as his State deems necessary.

#7: Without specific numbers, but using 538 representatives as a theoretical
base, approximately 12 committees (with further breakdown as they
deem necessary) to attempt to handle the intertwined policies and
desires of the People.  (A cross-functional committee would make 13
total.)
 
This is a process that should not be rushed; as it is a hope that in two
years the debate, analysis, counterarguments, ratification process and
establishment into law can be begin – assuming the discussion will last
to the 2012 Election cycle.   

#8: Possible Committees
  21st century Business & Economics
  Arts & Education Development
  Medicine, Science & Technology
  Engineering, Energy, Infrastructure & Climate Change
  Federal Budget Reform & Analysis
  Political Reform
  Efficiency & Effective Governmental Systems
  Legal Reform (Criminal & Civil)
  Agriculture, Conservation & Natural Resources
  Trade & Domestic Employment
  Security, Terrorism and Foreign Policy
  Disaster Management & Policy
  Unified Committee to Resolve Conflicting Amendments

#9: If, at the very least, this triggers an intelligent discussion, and the
search for information and analysis of the issues to put into play by the
hopeful Designers of the 21st Century Amendments to Our Hallowed
Constitution, then the work of a Convention should be called a success. 
 
Quality, not quantity, is the Experiment that is Good Governance. If we
should ignore this, then the problems will persist.
 
The impetus for a drastic alteration should be to suppress and eliminate
a much greater and fundamentally destructive dynamic: The internal and
external forces that are waging war against America. Some by accident;
some by design; but all are a linchpin to a catastrophic collapse in our
Freedoms and Choices as American Citizens.
 
Enduring change is done through the process of Law and Order. This
proposed convention for adapting the U.S. Constitution for the 21st
century is not about any singular argument, or advancement. It is about
trusting that We, The People, can respectfully and uniformly agree on the
Necessities of our Modern Life. It is about setting examples for a World
that is often amiss. That change and adaptation can happen quickly and
with great human benefits.
 
With Duty, Honor, Courage and Commitment, This Shall Be the Case.

Note: Minutes from the Original Constitutional Convention in 1787.

May 30, 2009

DocStoc & Lizzer: New Online Services with Pep, Next Step for me

Filed under: Uncategorized — jaypeefreely @ 2:40 pm
Tags: , , , , , ,

I still feel a bit lost in the malaise that is the Web 2.0 (or 2.2 or 3.0). I found useful these sites:

DocStoc provides a nice upload/download service that generates cash for all the documents you place online that are downloaded. ($.10 per download.) It offers many features – browsing items, html code insertions into blogs & homepages. It really is a slick site.

From their site:

Docstoc is the premier online community to find and share professional
documents. Docstoc provides the platform for users and businesses to upload and
share their documents with all the world, and serves as a vast repository of
documents in variety of categories including legal, business, financial,
technology, educational, and creative. All documents on docstoc can be easily
searched, previewed and downloaded for free.

Docstoc also provides technology through various APIs and Widgets to
help facilitate the sharing and promotion of documents across the web. The site
has popularized the use of embedding documents throughout the blogosphere and
mainstream media. You can learn more about embedding documents here: http://blog.docstoc.com/embed-documents-on-docstoc-into-your-blog-or-webiste.html

Lizzer seems a way to put Google, Blogger, Youtube, Docstoc on your websites. I haven’t done much yet, just got the account yesterday, but I will attempt it later.

As time marches, I find myself hoping these services last beyond 2009.

I am no longer going to ignore promotion, SEO and other techniques to generate the almighty dollar. While it was nice to stay above the fray, trying to make engaging blogs and content, what I did not do was go out of my way to promo things I did do.

Somehow that was considered pure and free of deplorable shilling of my stuff. Well, those days are coming to a halt.

To anyone who is doing well in this recession, I need new techniques to make money. Any suggested outlets?

I will likely spend next week on two things: reorganizing my online presence and research on a book.

I will post, at best, once a week.

May 22, 2009

To Love That is Lost: Cupid is axed. Alas, the TV Gods Gone Astray

I really loved Cupid.

It was a 1-hour of watching “matchmaker make me a match” – with the knowledge that such meddling would indeed end one in an insane asylum. (A place I sometimes rather be – than walking around in a perpetual fog.)

In the world of ratings, my blog would have been cancelled long ago. Not enough readership. Too few comments. Not enough straight dope on Heidi from “The Hills.”  (And I have never partaken of said show. I’m a blogger get me the F out of this TV hell.)

By no means is Cupid some new, catchy, creative show of unheralded genius just needing a respectable fleshing out. It was driven by Cupid himself, Bobby Cannavale, and that was about it. Sarah Paulson play an ok doctor – but she was not, nuerotically-enhanced enough to provide the fodder this show needed.

Back in the 90’s, when things seemed better, Jeremy Piven played Cupid in the series for 15 episodes. This time, Cupid’s failure to launch lasted 6 episodes.

So, is love lost? Are we so blatantly ignorant to grind up the show, not once (a regular staple of TVland), but twice?

Where has my Romeo and Juliet gone to suffer? Why is taming this shrew of an industry methinks too difficult to understand? Alas, why has Shakespeare and the Roman God of Love become second-rate for 2010 TV audiences?

Love has many facets – not that my eyes shine bright and brilliant with the liquor of lusty lurches into loves’ delights – but this facet, the searching for a facsimile of familar programming on the quest and queries of love are gone with the tides, “pray, oh, pray! How I weep! While I weep…”

Is their no TV God to abort this transgression! Shall I play the fool to these minions of subpar taste?

It is a good thing it is summer. As the sun shimmers across a lake, somewhere, and I pause to partake of a beguiling beauty on the shore. I’ll say, ” time for me to try my hand at being my own personal Cupid.” The summer’s sweetest game will unlikely end in conquest of her softest treasures, but it will make the sands feel smoother than anything else, aside from said lusty lass.

And the show is forgotten.

The lamb lies down.

And the God still fiddles with humanity, while I’ll eat another cheeto watching this fall on ABC, NBC, CBS or, ugh, Fox. (As I have no cable. Alas again, methinks I’m in the 1970s.  If so: “To sleep, perchance to dream-ay, there’s the rub.”)

May 19, 2009

Book title & design: What do you think?

Filed under: Uncategorized — jaypeefreely @ 3:49 pm

For those that like to vote & decide fates of things, here’s your chance:

Design #1

Less formal, but the ideas are there

Less formal, but the ideas are there

 

Design #2

Organized better, less images

Organized better, less images

 

So which one do you prefer?

Is the title: Bringin’ Gas & Dialin’ 9: A Seven Score Addiction to the National Pastime suit?

How about Bringin’ Gas & Dialin’ 9: A Seven Score Addiction to Professional Baseball & Its Development? (Too Long)

This book will be complete in November 2009. Revamped from the old version at anythingwritten.wordpress.com.

May 8, 2009

Star Trek: The New Frontier, the New Franchise

Last night, Star Trek opened in Lansing, IL to a sparse crowd. I mean sparse…like 25 people. However, the area is not known for being receptive to this sort of movie.

J.J. Abrams has taken over the Enterprise (NCC-1701) and the franchise that is Star Trek. With that weighty responsibility (for the Trekkies) Abrams exploits the one fundamental ingredient in Sci-Fi that is the most malleable to all these adeventures: Time.
Copious amounts of stories can be written, and undone, with the modification of the space-time line. Change of events, change of results. Like rolling a 1,000,000 sided dice to get a different outcome.
The Enterprise crew is everyone from the original series launched in the 1960s. This is an origin story, at first, but soon sets up the future events for the new director of the course of the Enterprise’s adventures.

Cast
To boldly go where no Star Trek movie has gone before...

To boldly go where no Star Trek movie has gone before...

Now, everything can be seen as far-fetched and difficult to understand in this origination story line. Roger Ebert, not always in his right mind, was playing his critiquing games on this classic. Which is always why it is annoying to please critics. They pick. They look for gaffs. They conjecture about what is wrong instead of what is RIGHT.
The cast pulled off an admirable job in framing this close enough to the 1960s characters while adding in the small amount of personal lives and new ticks that can be explored and elaborated on in future films.
And that is what I liked.
Technology is catching up to the Star Trek dream. Even the gritty scenes of the inside of the Enterprise seem a bit out of step with what is suppose to be happening in the 23rd century.
But it is the adventure of movies that makes a place like a Star Trek movie go where no movie has gone before…we hope.

 

May 5, 2009

Is it aTerrible Tuesday?: The forgettable day of the week

Filed under: Uncategorized — jaypeefreely @ 3:47 pm
Tags:

Short and sweet, Tuesday is the disrespected day. No one likes it – I mean, who wants to think of Tuesday as great?

I was out of ideas at the word: Tuesday. It gets no press – very little mentioning – unless it’s “Tuesday’s Gone with the Wind” by Hank Williams, Jr.

So the fact I wrote this post on it shows how bored I am. I downloaded some files today, listened to the Cubs for a bit, wrote on a book and now, I got to feed myself. (And watch Cupid.)

That’s Tuesday. Such a forgettable day. Humpday tomorrow. Friday night lights means either Star Trek again or reading at Barnes & Nobles.

Such is my life.

April 29, 2009

Beam Me Up Scottie!: Star Trek 2009 a Blockbuster

Chris Pine the new James Tiberius Kirk

Chris Pine the new James Tiberius Kirk

If you’ve been living in the future for years, setting your phasers to stun and praying for a day to kick some Klingon ass, this movie comes as close to the near future as you’ll get.

I shouldn’t get too Trekkie on you, yet. But it is always a pleasure to escape the current problems of a nation via the Star Trek transporter.

The movie will take you back to the beginning, the en vogue thing to do in these Hollywood-is-out-of-ideas times. (Hey, do the Shannara series, Hollywood?)

Star Trek opens 5.08.09 to what is likely to be the largest audience looking for The Final Frontier as a means to quell their latest fears – Swine Flu, anyone?

Zoe Saldana is Uhura, and damn!!!

Zoe Saldana is Uhura, and damn!!!

This cast looks every bit the part of a group destine to do some incredible things in the Star Trek movie franchise. The trailers (14 Trailers are here.) make this story move in a way that 2 hours of film time does not seem logical.

Forgive my slipping into Star Trekese since it a bad habit that only a Hypherion drink on Quantas Four could do proper justice. (Made up that too.)

Since I can’t relate any star adventures of my own, I just hope to be there when a phaser hits a baddie, and a young Kirk says something so irrational that all of us feel that it is a product of being human that make this a movie worthy of a 10 pieces of gold press latium.

(A recent review calls it ’F-ing Amazing…’)

Primary Cast members

John Cho Hikaru Sulu
Ben Cross Sarek
Bruce Greenwood Capt. Christopher Pike
Simon Pegg Scotty
Chris Pine James T. Kirk
Zachary Quinto Spock
Winona Ryder Amanda Grayson
Zoe Saldana Nyota Uhura
Karl Urban Dr. Leonard ‘Bones’ McCoy
Anton Yelchin Pavel Chekov
Eric Bana Nero
Leonard Nimoy Old Spock

April 27, 2009

The 2009-2010 Chicago Bears: The Greatest Show on Field Turf?

Filed under: Uncategorized — jaypeefreely @ 3:47 pm

It would be nice if the Bears did go to field turf. The grass is all-natural, like many of the women I would like to date, but for playing in the 21st century, an offense-friendly system that assists these millionaires in slobber knocking the visiting team’s defense makes sense.

But today’s psychic vision is one of joy as Lovie & Co. drafted potentially a pass-happy group of players in the mold of Air Coryell and Mike Martz.
Lovie Smith knows what the Greatest Show on Turf looks like. He coached the defense of the 2001 St. Louis Rams (Super Bowl losers by a hair), when QB Kurt Warner went from the cute grocery bagger to 1st-team chick magnet (but married) in the span of two years in the late 1990s.
Kurt got the MVP hardware too. Imagine a Chicago QB with that…
So what about that team and this team? Why are the Bears prepared to be the ‘Midway terrific offensive attack’ instead of the brutish Monsters of the Carnival?
Since off-season moves and the draft count essentially together, here’s the breakdown:
  • Traded for all-pro QB Jay Cutler, who has a great arm to go deep always with
  • Snatched up LOT Orlando Pace – a familar cog in the St. Louis Ram system
  • Drafted WRs Juaquin Iglesias and Johnny Knox(right). Iglesias is more of a possession style receiver with 4.54 speed but a solid West Coast material. Meanwhile, Knox is a burner at 4.34 with agility and hands.

This goes along with RB Matt Forte’s agility to catch the ball tremendously well out of the backfield (64 rec) and WR Devin Hester’s home run ability. Meanwhile, TE Greg Olsen is a matchup headache for anyone.

 

Pass protection is critical to the success of this scenario because at least two of the five receivers will run a deep in, skinny post, comeback, speed out, or shallow cross. (Hester and Knox seemed to be suited for this.) This system was mastered by Mike Martz in St. Louis but gives props to Sid Gillman and the ultimate refinement by NFL coach Don Coryell. (With QB Dan Fouts, John Jefferson , Wes Chandler Kellen Winslow, Charlie Joiner doing the on-the-field stuff, that’s all.)

The Bears have the needed players:

  1. QB with ability to throw for over 4,000 yards accurately
  2. Running back versatile enough to catch 60-70 balls and run for 1,200 yards and block
  3. 2 WRs with sub 4.35 speed. Hester, with work, can become a lethal deep ball man. Knox smells of being that special deep-in guy.
  4. Olsen gives them a proven TE that creates the headache in out routes or down the middle.
  5. O-line of LOT Pace, C Kruetz, ROT Shaffer (another acquisition) and Chris Williams (from Vandy, Cutler’s alma mater) should be able to execute this blocking scheme.
  6. Offensive Coordinator Ron Turner certainly can open up the playbook – brother Norv Turner might even help.

That’s my prediction. Let’s see what transpires.

April 17, 2009

The Dragon vs. The Eagle: Trade Wars and Beyond ‘The Boston’ Tea Party

It should come to no one’s surprise that our Dragon has gotten too big for his britches. That since 1978, when we open the door to an enlightened trade policy, China has taken great advantage of free trade, to the detriment of the USA. The eagle has flown too close to the fire of the dragon – allowing it to dictate now how we operate in trade markets and foreign relationships. (Its support of Sudan in the Darfur crisis. Its edict and proposal for a new global currency - obviously, to undermine our U.S. dollar and to put China as the controlling financial superpower.)

A breakdown of trade data since 1985 is as follows:
From: http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html#1985

Trade Deficit USA China
Year Exports Imports Trade Deficit President
1985 3,855.70 3,861.70 -6 Reagan
1986 3,106.30 4,771.00 -1,664.70 Reagan
1987 3,497.30 6,293.60 -2,796.30 Reagan
1988 5,021.60 8,510.90 -3,489.30 Reagan
1989 5,755.40 11,989.70 -6,234.30 Bush
1990 4,806.40 15,237.40 -10,431.00 Bush
1991 6,278.20 18,969.20 -12,691.00 Bush
1992 7,418.50 25,727.50 -18,309.00 Bush
1993 8,762.90 31,539.90 -22,777.00 Clinton
1994 9,281.70 38,786.80 -29,505.10 Clinton
1995 11,753.70 45,543.20 -33,789.50 Clinton
1996 11,992.60 51,512.80 -39,520.20 Clinton
1997 12,862.20 62,557.70 -49,695.50 Clinton
1998 14,241.20 71,168.60 -56,927.40 Clinton
1999 13,111.10 81,788.20 -68,677.10 Clinton
2000 16,185.20 100,018.20 -83,833.00 Clinton
2001 19,182.30 102,278.40 -83,096.10 Bush II
2002 22,127.70 125,192.60 -103,064.90 Bush II
2003 28,367.90 152,436.10 -124,068.20 Bush II
2004 34,744.10 196,682.00 -161,938.00 Bush II
2005 41,925.30 243,470.10 -201,544.80 Bush II
2006 55,185.70 287,774.40 -232,588.60 Bush II
2007 65,236.10 321,442.90 -256,206.70 Bush II
2008 71,457.10 337,789.80 -266,332.70 Bush II
2009 4,178.10 24,748.00 -20,569.90 Obama*
Trade Deficit USA China Billions (Deficit)
Reagan 15,480.9 23,437.2 -7.96
Bush 24,258.5 71,923.8 -47.67
Clinton 98,190.6 482,915.4 -384.72
Bush II 338,226.2 1,767,066.3 -1,428.84

It takes very little understanding or logic to see that of the $1 Trillion plus in U.S. currency China is sitting on, most of it came in just the past 4-8 years. Even if you compare George W. Bush to Clinton (who didn’t help create the original policy, but carried it through) - but compared to our NAFTA partners, trade with China was of little consequence, then - it is no real comparison.

China’s goods have steamrolled America’s manufacturing might. With a few instances of dangerous goods entering the United States.

Trade with NAFTA partners:
Source: http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c1220.html

Canadian Trade USA Canadian Imbalance
  Millions Exports Imports Balance
2008 TOTAL  261,380.00 335,555.30 -74,175.30
2007 TOTAL  248,888.10 317,056.80 -68,168.60
2006 TOTAL  230,656.00 302,437.90 -71,781.80

Source: http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c2010.html

Mexican Trade USA Mexican Imbalance
  Millions Exports Imports Balance
2008 TOTAL  151,538.60 215,914.90 -64,376.30
2007 TOTAL  136,092.10 210,714.00 -74,621.80
2006 TOTAL  133,978.80 198,253.20 -64,274.30

We actually had a trade surplus with Mexico back in 1994, shipping several billion more to them than they did to us. But since, we have ran trade deficits of significant amounts with OPEC nations, the European Union, Japan, and the United Kingdom (as part of the EU, it likely is not as important.)

Trying to support the world’s trade – and allowing a communist nation to have us in over a barrel – is a likely cause of a trade war. Mexico, with their recent troubles against drug lords, has imposed tariffs on our goods since we stopped their trucks from roaming freely. They are just one of many. Japan’s trade is off by 50% in the last two months.

And protectionist policies are what governments are prone to do – to keep the fringe people from turning to revolution. (Even though it does not promote economic stabilityonly ascerbates the problem. Yet, trade is suppose to be fair & equal - not free (meaning: constraints to it are reasoned/reasonable due to the destruction of otherwise competitive markets in the consuming country, as the saving country manufactures at will) - when we run these huge deficits it sells off the assets of the United States because these other countries have to reinvest those notes somewhere where they can get the most benefit – where else but the United States?)

Yet, the biggest consequence of the prior policies is that it has hamstrung our ability to modify our own economy. Yesterday, people embarked on a Tea Party protest of their taxes being raised or the policies of the Obama administration. Really? Are we that desperate to show our anger toward what is the only course of action – to rebuild through infrastructure projects, education dollars and energy programs.

Conservatives our forgetting that it was George W. Bush, not Obama, that put off technology, energy and educational improvements to go with a holy war, a financial Ponzi scheme of epic size and scope and ignoring the fleecing of America through trade imbalances.

China has us by the short and curlies for now. If we ignore them, they will make policies that can only lead to confrontation on a military field. Proxy wars are inevitable; sown in the economic philosophies of conservative thoughts. Yet, we can reverse this direction through smart investments, economic independence (not revolution on hypocritic grounds) and a spirit that led our forefathers to explore, innovate and invent an entire nation.

Make no mistake about it: we are in a war of ideology. But we have to tamper the crazy talk and fight both fronts smartly. The external threat and the internal craziness that grips aspects of fringe people unwilling to reason out their beliefs to a better end. We must if America is to maintain its place as the sole superpower.

A place I must admit I have a hard time giving up.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.